Wednesday, November 24, 2010

21st Century Skills

I was very impressed by the website Partnership for 21st Century Skills. I think it is well thought out and innovative. I was saddened that my state is not a participant. I think education is far behind technology, and the ideas in this website could help to bring education closer to meeting the needs of technology in the workplace and in life.
I was surprised that Missouri was not a part of this project. I was also surprised that Illinois was a part of it. As I read through the Illinois’ site, I found that they are working on updating their state assessments. I really think Missouri needs to be working on that as well. I was pleasantly surprised that someone is working on updating those assessments.
I disagreed with some of the information in the rainbow and rings symbol on the home page. It was a pretty good depiction of things, except I do not think standards and assessments have caught up with the technology rainbow. Since this is a core support for the rainbow, I think it would have to come first. I think the assessments, in particular, state assessments, are way behind in this area (and in other areas). State assessments are just now going “on line” in Missouri and they do not really incorporate any technology other than that the traditional test is now online. It is the same format just available on the computer, now.
I also think the state tests neglect the collaboration component and possibly the creativity component. Technology is also not included in the state standards; in Missouri they are called Grade Level Expectations. I think we must rush to get these supports in place or the whole rainbow may fall. It is very important that our state standards and assessments get on board with technology and the new types of learning. Teachers must feel that their work in technology and collaboration is important. If this support was really in place, I think there would be less resistance from teachers to incorporate these necessary skills.
I think that students and educators need to embrace the idea of 21st century skills. Illinois had a wonderful idea of making sure the principals are on board with the program. This is a key component to making it work. No matter what I want to do as a teacher, I must have the support of my principal to truly feel successful. Principals are also the key to getting educators on board and to supporting students in their endeavors.
The second thing Illinois was doing was updating their state assessments. I think if we are going to work toward a broader view of education which will include more learning of technology and collaboration, we must update the state assessments. I am tired of state assessments that nearly demand we teach to them in order to get our state money, and also demand that we do not teach to them. There are so many things not taken into account. Things that are not tested are deemed as worthless, instead of essential education. These things, such as collaboration, computer knowledge, etc. may be the whole pillars of our future. I realize that state assessments cannot test everything. However, because of the new direction that learning for the workplace is taking us, we must update our assessment and the sooner, the better.
This site is an excellent source. I was disappointed that the professional development was already over. I could not have afforded to go to New York City for it anyway, but I wish there would be some professional development near me that I could attend. I am wondering how to go about getting my state involved. I wish the website had been more specific about what you can do to spur your state to join. It did give some information, but I am still not sure what I need to do as an educator to help this happen.

3 comments:

  1. Hi Missy,

    My first view of the the website Partnership for the 21st Century also left me disapointed to not semy state and district listed. I agree, I also believe education is far beyond technology and this website lends a hand in informing us as to what is needed to bring education closer to meeting the needs of technology in the work place. I do believe this site is a excellent source for educators. I found that its focus was more on the upper grades but it gave me some idea and insights.
    Sandra

    ReplyDelete
  2. Missy,
    It is upsetting that not all states are included in this site, but I still feel that it offers great resources for teachers. I also liked your comments on state assessments. It is a farce that states ask us to administer these test, but not teach to them. I have struggled with this as secondary teacher for years. Any advice with the best ways to deal with these tests?
    Thanks
    Mike Ruark

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mike,
    I think we just have to muddle through the tests for now, but I am hoping if enough teachers continue to talk, eventually the tests will change. I am not sure how to change the tests or what to change them to, but there is some talk of judging by individual improvement instead of a certain grade. This would be better, but not really solve the problem. I wish I had a solution, but I can not think of a way to test that would truly test the things we want to test. I want to see us test collaboration and communication skills. I would love to see us test things that are not easily tested and are even harder to grade objectively. I think maybe we could do something with projects instead of tests, but I am not sure how to go about that. I have many bright students who do poorly on those tests. They do not really show what the student is can do. Any ideas?

    ReplyDelete